Dance workflow contrasts MiniMax consistency with Seedance motion
emotional-yoda compared outputs labeled MiniMax H3 and Seedance 2.0 from one broad prompt for a couple dancing across multiple camera angles. The author found MiniMax better at preserving character appearance, but said its camera stayed fixed and the sequence ended in a still frame. Seedance produced more motion, expressions, and angle changes, with slight character drift and higher credit use in that setup. In a follow-up, the author called this a quick workflow, not a proper benchmark, and proposed retesting with tailored prompts.
Show discussion detailsHide discussion details
In the repliesOne reply asked for the exact prompt before judging the outputs. hurdurdur7 requested steps and resolution. Ipwnurface said camera movement was achievable without a LoRA in their own setup, challenging a universal camera-angle limitation.
The model labels come from the post. Provider, exact prompt, resolution, and generation settings were not verified; one workflow does not establish model rankings or official prices.
Original post and replies pdehzf5, pdg1tv5, pdl28f4, and the author’s pdfaigk qualification; posted October 2 and reviewed October 6.